Why Permixa

An agent needs a budget, not your keys

An agent may need to buy a report or call a paid service. Giving it unrestricted wallet access makes every prompt, integration and dependency part of your custody boundary.

Permixa separates the request from permission and execution. An organization grants bounded purchasing power; its customer-local Signer independently enforces the final limits.

A small, understandable example

A research assistant has a $5 daily budget and a $0.25 purchase ceiling. It can use the explicitly selected supported test networks, but all purchases share that same USD budget.

If a requested purchase exceeds its policy, Permixa rejects it. If cloud authorization exceeds the customer's hard limits, the Signer rejects it. The agent never receives wallet keys.

This example explains the model; it is not a claim that an arbitrary website can be purchased from without integration.

Working capital without automatic custody

An organization can distinguish reserves from funds allocated for routine agent activity. Treasury targets help express that intent, while actual transfers and conversions remain separately governed.

The current demo keeps automatic rebalancing off. A richer autonomous treasury is product direction, not a capability silently enabled by selecting more payment networks.

Try the current experience

Start with the testnet walkthrough, explore the dashboard guide, or read the architecture. The demo is invite-only and does not claim production, mainnet or real-money readiness.